Article title: CRIMINAL LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMES IN THE FIELD OF BANKING: MODERN FEATURES AND POSSIBLE PROSPECTS
Article author: Pivovarova Anastasia Alexandrovna
Number of pages: 8
Contact mail: nastishe@mail.ru
Аbout the author:
Annotation:
The article is devoted to the study of the protective tasks of the criminal law in
criminal cases of banking crimes. It also raises the question of improving the effectiveness of measures to counter banking crimes. The author singles out banking
crimes into a special group and gives their definition. Special attention is paid to
the description of the scientific classifications of banking crimes. The main part of
the article is devoted to the theoretical and practical analysis of the criminal law
consequences of banking crimes. The author substantiates the idea of preserving
the specific consequences of criminal measures for the person who committed the
crime, regardless of the type of criminal activity. The fundamental principles of
criminal law should not be violated even for the sake of the economic viability of
certain activities. Measures of criminal legal influence are considered by the author
as a tool for fulfilling the protective task. The law enforcement practice data is
examined in detail: reports on the state of crime in Russia of the Ministry of Internal
Affairs of the Russian Federation, summary reports on the work of the courts of
general jurisdiction of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the
Russian Federation. Criminal legal measures, which are most often applied to persons who have committed banking crimes, are examined. The features of exemption from criminal liability at the stage of preliminary investigation and in court are
studied. Based on the analysis of the grounds for exemption from criminal liability,
a forecast is given on possible changes to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation regarding criminal liability for crimes in the banking sector. It is concluded
that the rules of criminalization and decriminalization of acts are observed, as well
as the need for a clear differentiation of the consequences of offenses not only by
formal, but also by substantive criteria.